<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cue Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted from beautiful exotic hardwoods.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur bacon</title>
		<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arthur bacon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan...I have always admired your integrity and profound determination to build the best possible cue. I might just put in an order for one of your new sneaky petes. In as much as you are asking for input; as you know from our previous correspondence, I am all for the greatest possible simplicity vis a vis design (Porsche, Leica, old stainless Rolexes, Brooks Brothers, Apple etc). Your cue making and craft level is so high you could probably make a pretty good cue out of an old broomstick. What I would love to have is a &quot;real&quot; sneaky pete made by you; one without a phenolic joint; a stick which would however, have beautiful wood in the butt and at most a modest ring above the rubber, but otherwise a stick of perfect balance, loving craftsmanship and absolute simplicity. Perhaps it is just my low self esteem but I think there might be other folks out there who would love having a truly professional quality stick without attracting any attention to it. Then again, I am always traveling and playing in weird places so...Sometimes, I am tempted to buy one of your sticks just as an investment! Ciao, Arthur]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan&#8230;I have always admired your integrity and profound determination to build the best possible cue. I might just put in an order for one of your new sneaky petes. In as much as you are asking for input; as you know from our previous correspondence, I am all for the greatest possible simplicity vis a vis design (Porsche, Leica, old stainless Rolexes, Brooks Brothers, Apple etc). Your cue making and craft level is so high you could probably make a pretty good cue out of an old broomstick. What I would love to have is a &#8220;real&#8221; sneaky pete made by you; one without a phenolic joint; a stick which would however, have beautiful wood in the butt and at most a modest ring above the rubber, but otherwise a stick of perfect balance, loving craftsmanship and absolute simplicity. Perhaps it is just my low self esteem but I think there might be other folks out there who would love having a truly professional quality stick without attracting any attention to it. Then again, I am always traveling and playing in weird places so&#8230;Sometimes, I am tempted to buy one of your sticks just as an investment! Ciao, Arthur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vito</title>
		<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mario Vito]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bryan,


I bought one of your Beautiful Birdseye Maple cues Years Ago with 2 Shafts.  And that Birdseye Maple cue is one hell of a  Players cue...  

A very close friend of my wanted your cue, so I sold it to him, which I regreted...
 
I like the &quot;Larger diameter&quot; that you use to have in your old cues.  And I like the 3/8 X 11 Pin that you Use then...  &quot;I Feel, it is Way Better&quot; than the 3/8 X 10 Pin that you are using today....

I ordered 2 cues from you lately when you were having a special, for 800.00 plus 100.00 for leather wrap...

When I got the cues that you made for me, I was really Happy !  It was Beautiful ...

But you installed a 3/8 X 10 pin, instead of a 3/8 X 11 Pin which I really Wanted.  

The hit of your New Cues with the 3/8 X 10 Jointed pin is &quot;Way Softer&quot; that ----  the 3/8 X 11 Jointed Pin...

So, I&#039;m struggling what to do with the 2 New Cues that I bought from you...   

I spoke to my close friend who bought my Old Bryan Mordt&#039;s Birdseye Maple cue... And I wanted to trade my New Bryan Mordt&#039;s to him...

I Use to be one of the top players here in CA, so I love having
a good solid playing cue And a Beautiful Cue...

I still like your old cues Bryan, they are &quot; Way Better &quot; with the 3/8 X 11 Pin, thank your New cues with a 3/8 X 10 Pin today Bryan...  ( My Opinion )

Don&#039;t Get me Wrong Bryan, You Make Beautiful playing cues...  And you are One hell of a Guy ( Really Nice Guy:)

But I like your Old Cues, with a 3/8 X 11 Pin.  They are &quot;Way Better&quot; in Perfermance as a Playing cue..  

I hope you go back in using your 3/8 X 11 Pins...


Thank you for making Beautiful cues and All your Kindness Bryan...   You&#039;re one hell of a guy...



Best regards, Mario]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan,</p>
<p>I bought one of your Beautiful Birdseye Maple cues Years Ago with 2 Shafts.  And that Birdseye Maple cue is one hell of a  Players cue&#8230;  </p>
<p>A very close friend of my wanted your cue, so I sold it to him, which I regreted&#8230;</p>
<p>I like the &#8220;Larger diameter&#8221; that you use to have in your old cues.  And I like the 3/8 X 11 Pin that you Use then&#8230;  &#8220;I Feel, it is Way Better&#8221; than the 3/8 X 10 Pin that you are using today&#8230;.</p>
<p>I ordered 2 cues from you lately when you were having a special, for 800.00 plus 100.00 for leather wrap&#8230;</p>
<p>When I got the cues that you made for me, I was really Happy !  It was Beautiful &#8230;</p>
<p>But you installed a 3/8 X 10 pin, instead of a 3/8 X 11 Pin which I really Wanted.  </p>
<p>The hit of your New Cues with the 3/8 X 10 Jointed pin is &#8220;Way Softer&#8221; that &#8212;-  the 3/8 X 11 Jointed Pin&#8230;</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m struggling what to do with the 2 New Cues that I bought from you&#8230;   </p>
<p>I spoke to my close friend who bought my Old Bryan Mordt&#8217;s Birdseye Maple cue&#8230; And I wanted to trade my New Bryan Mordt&#8217;s to him&#8230;</p>
<p>I Use to be one of the top players here in CA, so I love having<br />
a good solid playing cue And a Beautiful Cue&#8230;</p>
<p>I still like your old cues Bryan, they are &#8221; Way Better &#8221; with the 3/8 X 11 Pin, thank your New cues with a 3/8 X 10 Pin today Bryan&#8230;  ( My Opinion )</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Get me Wrong Bryan, You Make Beautiful playing cues&#8230;  And you are One hell of a Guy ( Really Nice Guy:)</p>
<p>But I like your Old Cues, with a 3/8 X 11 Pin.  They are &#8220;Way Better&#8221; in Perfermance as a Playing cue..  </p>
<p>I hope you go back in using your 3/8 X 11 Pins&#8230;</p>
<p>Thank you for making Beautiful cues and All your Kindness Bryan&#8230;   You&#8217;re one hell of a guy&#8230;</p>
<p>Best regards, Mario</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Wolfson</title>
		<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc Wolfson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what he said, with phenolic ringwork, joint collars and buttcap and wrapless ... would make a nice basic cue in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what he said, with phenolic ringwork, joint collars and buttcap and wrapless &#8230; would make a nice basic cue in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Mordt</title>
		<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Mordt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Raymond:

I plan on having some $260 sneaky petes coming out soon. I appreciate your input and would like to offer something like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raymond:</p>
<p>I plan on having some $260 sneaky petes coming out soon. I appreciate your input and would like to offer something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Claytor</title>
		<link>http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond Claytor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcmcue.com/2009/06/13/cue-poll/#comment-87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOW ABOUT A SNEAKY PETE WITH LOTS OF FIGURE, HIGHLY FIGURED USING BIRDSEYE OR CURLY MAPLE AND COCOBOLO.
I MEAN REALLY FIGURED TOP QUALITY WOODS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW ABOUT A SNEAKY PETE WITH LOTS OF FIGURE, HIGHLY FIGURED USING BIRDSEYE OR CURLY MAPLE AND COCOBOLO.<br />
I MEAN REALLY FIGURED TOP QUALITY WOODS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

